Convert HTML to images, screenshots, and PDFs. SnapAPI is the HCTI alternative with scraping and data extraction built in — at a lower price point.
HTML/CSS to Image (hcti.io) is a screenshot API that specializes in rendering HTML templates into images. It is popular for generating Open Graph images, email template previews, and social media cards from HTML. SnapAPI covers all of these use cases and adds URL-based screenshots, full web scraping, structured data extraction, and PDF generation — for the same or lower monthly cost.
| Feature | HCTI | SnapAPI |
|---|---|---|
| HTML to image (PNG/JPG) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Screenshot from URL | ✓ | ✓ |
| PDF from URL or HTML | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web scraping (clean Markdown) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Structured data extraction | ✗ | ✓ |
| Official multi-language SDKs | JS, Python, Ruby | JS, Python, Go, PHP, Swift, Kotlin |
| Free tier | 50/mo | 200/mo |
The most common HCTI use case is generating Open Graph images dynamically — one branded image per blog post or product page. SnapAPI handles this with the screenshot endpoint: build your OG template as an HTML page, pass the URL to SnapAPI with a 1200x630 viewport, and get back a PNG ready to serve as an og:image.
// Next.js API route: generate OG image for each blog post
import type { NextApiRequest, NextApiResponse } from 'next';
export default async function handler(req: NextApiRequest, res: NextApiResponse) {
const { title, author, date } = req.query;
// Your OG template hosted at /og-template?title=...&author=...
const templateUrl = `https://yourdomain.com/og-template?title=${encodeURIComponent(title as string)}`;
const snap = await fetch(
`https://api.snapapi.pics/v1/screenshot?url=${encodeURIComponent(templateUrl)}&width=1200&height=630&format=png`,
{ headers: { 'X-API-Key': process.env.SNAP_API_KEY! } }
);
const img = await snap.arrayBuffer();
res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'image/png');
res.setHeader('Cache-Control', 's-maxage=86400, stale-while-revalidate');
res.send(Buffer.from(img));
}
HCTI’s main differentiator is accepting raw HTML as POST body input. SnapAPI supports this too for the PDF endpoint, and for screenshots the recommended approach is to serve the HTML at a URL (even a local one via ngrok for development) and pass that URL. This gives you full CSS support including external fonts and stylesheets:
# PDF from raw HTML (works identically to HCTI HTML-to-image concept)
curl -X POST https://api.snapapi.pics/v1/pdf \
-H "X-API-Key: YOUR_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"html": "Hello World
", "format": "A4"}' \
--output output.pdf
| Plan | HCTI | SnapAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 50 images/mo | 200 calls/mo (screenshot+scrape+PDF) |
| Starter | $19/mo — 1,000 images | $19/mo — 5,000 calls, all endpoints |
| Growth | $49/mo — 5,000 images | $79/mo — 50,000 calls, all endpoints |
Yes via the PDF endpoint. For screenshots, the recommended approach is to serve the HTML at a URL and pass that URL. This is more reliable than inline HTML because external stylesheets and fonts load correctly.
Yes, pass device_scale_factor=2 to get a 2x resolution screenshot at your specified viewport dimensions.
Both return results in 2-5 seconds for standard pages. SnapAPI’s browser watchdog ensures Chromium instances are always warm and ready, which keeps p50 latency low even during traffic spikes.
4× more free calls. PDF, scrape, and extract included. Same simple REST API.
Get Your Free API KeyHCTI is purpose-built for a specific workflow: take an HTML template, inject dynamic data, render to PNG. It does this well. The limitation appears when your product requirements expand. If you need to screenshot existing live URLs rather than rendering HTML templates, or if you need to extract text and structured data from web pages, or if you need to generate PDFs for document workflows, HCTI becomes one service among several you need to orchestrate. SnapAPI covers all of these with one integration point.
The most common expansion path looks like this: a team starts with HCTI for OG image generation. Then they add a screenshot API to capture external URLs for monitoring. Then they add a scraping service to extract content for an AI feature. By this point they are paying three API bills, managing three sets of credentials, and dealing with three potential points of failure. SnapAPI collapses this to one.
Both HCTI and SnapAPI use Chromium-based rendering, which means full CSS support: CSS Grid, Flexbox, CSS custom properties, CSS animations (in the rendered frame), and modern layout features all work correctly. This is the key advantage over older rendering approaches like wkhtmltopdf, which uses an abandoned WebKit build and lacks Grid support entirely, or headless Firefox which has historically rendered fonts differently from Chrome.
For OG image generation, the critical CSS features are typically custom fonts (Google Fonts or self-hosted), CSS Grid for layout, and CSS gradients for backgrounds. All of these work in SnapAPI with no configuration. You design the template in a browser, screenshot it with SnapAPI, and the output matches what you see in Chrome exactly.
For OG image generation, the typical latency target is under 2 seconds because the image is often served in response to a real user request. SnapAPI returns screenshots in 1.5-4 seconds for typical templates. Caching the results at the CDN level is the standard pattern: generate the OG image once, cache with a long max-age, serve from edge for subsequent requests. This keeps the actual API call rare and the latency acceptable for even the most latency-sensitive use cases.
For higher-throughput scenarios like batch processing, SnapAPI supports up to 10 concurrent requests on paid plans. Teams generating OG images for an entire content catalog during a migration or rebranding typically run batch jobs that process thousands of URLs overnight without hitting throughput limits.
If you are switching from HCTI to SnapAPI for screenshot use cases, the checklist is short. First, sign up at snapapi.pics and get your API key from the dashboard. Second, identify all places in your codebase where you call the HCTI API. Third, if you are posting raw HTML to HCTI, host that HTML as a URL instead and pass the URL to SnapAPI’s screenshot endpoint. The URL approach is more reliable because external stylesheets and fonts load correctly. Fourth, update the viewport dimensions to match your requirements. Fifth, update the response handling to use the binary body directly. The HCTI response is a JSON object with an image URL; SnapAPI returns the image bytes directly in the response body, which is simpler to handle and avoids a second HTTP round-trip.
The most successful teams using SnapAPI build around three core workflow patterns. The first is on-demand generation triggered by user action: a user clicks Export or Share, the application calls SnapAPI synchronously or via a background job, and the result is returned to the user within a few seconds. This pattern works well for PDF invoices, screenshot thumbnails, and OG image generation. Response time matters, so caching the result in S3 or a CDN and serving subsequent requests from cache is essential at any meaningful scale.
The second pattern is scheduled batch processing: a cron job or queue-based worker runs overnight or on a fixed schedule, processing a list of URLs and storing the results. Website monitoring tools use this pattern to capture daily screenshots for visual diff alerts. Price monitoring pipelines use it to extract product data from thousands of e-commerce pages. Content aggregators use it to scrape and index hundreds of sources daily. SnapAPI handles all of these with the same endpoints and the same authentication.
The third pattern is event-driven processing: a webhook or message queue triggers a SnapAPI call whenever a relevant event occurs. A new product is added to the catalog, triggering a screenshot for the listing thumbnail. A customer submits a URL for monitoring, triggering an initial capture. A content management system publishes a new article, triggering OG image generation. This pattern integrates SnapAPI into the normal event flow of an application rather than treating it as a standalone feature.
SnapAPI keys should never appear in client-side code, public repositories, or URL parameters. Store them in environment variables and access them server-side only. If you need to trigger screenshots from a frontend application, proxy the request through your backend: the frontend calls your API, your backend adds the SnapAPI key and forwards to SnapAPI, and returns the result to the frontend. This keeps the key out of browser network logs and JavaScript bundles entirely.
Unlike some screenshot APIs that pass the API key as a query parameter (which appears in server logs and browser history), SnapAPI uses the X-API-Key header. This is the correct pattern for production API authentication because headers are not logged by most reverse proxies and CDNs in their default configuration, and they are not visible in browser address bars or shared link previews.