Comparison · Updated March 2026

SnapAPI vs Firecrawl:
Screenshots + Scraping vs Scraping Only

Firecrawl is a strong web scraping tool. SnapAPI does everything Firecrawl does — plus screenshots, PDF generation, OG image rendering, and video recording. One API key for the whole stack.

SnapAPI SnapAPI
VS
FC Firecrawl
200 free requests/month No credit card required 6 official SDKs Cancel any time

SnapAPI includes

  • Web scraping — structured JSON
  • Content extraction — Markdown for LLMs
  • Screenshots (PNG/JPEG/WebP/AVIF)
  • Full-page capture
  • PDF generation
  • OG image generation
  • Video recording
  • 6 SDKs — JS, Python, Go, PHP, Swift, Kotlin
  • Permanent free tier, no credit card

Firecrawl includes

  • Web scraping — structured JSON
  • Content extraction — Markdown for LLMs
  • No screenshot capture
  • No full-page screenshots
  • No PDF generation
  • No OG image generation
  • No video recording
  • JS, Python, Node, Go, Rust SDKs
  • Free tier available
🏆

SnapAPI is a superset of Firecrawl's capabilities — plus visual capture

Both extract web content for LLMs. SnapAPI adds screenshots, PDFs, OG images, and video recording — plus Swift and Kotlin SDKs for mobile. One API key handles your entire web data and visual capture stack.

Start free

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Every capability that matters for web data extraction, visual capture, and LLM pipelines.

Feature SnapAPI Recommended Firecrawl
Web scraping — structured JSONExtract page data as JSON
Content extraction — MarkdownClean text for LLM context windows
Screenshot capturePNG, JPEG, WebP, AVIF Not available
Full-page screenshots
PDF generationURL or raw HTML to PDF Not available
OG image generationRender HTML templates to images
Video recordingFull browser session capture
JavaScript rendering
Anti-bot / stealth mode
Custom headers & cookies
Swift SDK (iOS / macOS)
Kotlin SDK (Android / JVM)
JavaScript / Python / Go SDKs
PHP SDK
Permanent free tier 200 req/mo, no card ~ Limited free tier
Starter price $19/month $16/mo (scrape credits only)
Bulk crawl / sitemap support ~ Via queue Native crawl mode
S3 / cloud storage upload ~

Pricing Comparison

SnapAPI covers both scraping and visual capture use cases in a single subscription. No need for separate tools.

Free forever
SnapAPI Free
$0/month
200 requests · all capabilities
  • Scraping + screenshots + PDF
  • No trial expiry
  • 6 SDKs available
Get free key →
Firecrawl Hobby
$16/month
3,000 credits · scraping only
  • No screenshot capture
  • No PDF generation
  • No video recording
  • No Swift / Kotlin / PHP SDKs
  • ~ Credit-based billing
Visit Firecrawl

Prices as of March 2026. Visit each vendor for current rates.

When to use SnapAPI instead of Firecrawl

📷

You need screenshots alongside data

Firecrawl extracts text. SnapAPI extracts text and captures screenshots. If your workflow requires both — visual QA, monitoring, archival, or SaaS features that export PDFs — SnapAPI is the only choice that does not require a second vendor.

📑

Building SaaS features that export PDFs

Report generation, invoice rendering, document export — these require a PDF API, not just a scraper. SnapAPI's /v1/pdf endpoint renders any URL or raw HTML to a production-quality PDF. Firecrawl cannot do this at all.

🖼

OG image generation for your platform

If you generate dynamic Open Graph images for blog posts, products, or user profiles, SnapAPI handles this with the same API key you use for scraping. Firecrawl offers no equivalent.

🚀

Mobile teams building iOS or Android apps

SnapAPI ships official Swift and Kotlin SDKs. If your app needs to capture screenshots of URLs or extract content on device, SnapAPI has first-class mobile support. Firecrawl does not offer Swift or Kotlin SDKs.

🎥

You need browser session recordings

SnapAPI's video recording endpoint captures full browser sessions — useful for QA automation, user journey documentation, and visual regression testing. Firecrawl does not offer video recording.

🔒

PHP backend without switching languages

SnapAPI ships an official PHP SDK. Firecrawl does not. PHP teams using Laravel, Symfony, or WordPress can integrate without writing a raw HTTP client from scratch.

Same scraping capability. More on top.

Use SnapAPI exactly as you would Firecrawl for extraction — then use the same key for screenshots, PDFs, and video.

SnapAPI — curl examples
# Extract Markdown (same as Firecrawl's core use case)
curl -G "https://api.snapapi.pics/v1/extract" \
  --data-urlencode "url=https://example.com" \
  -H "X-Api-Key: YOUR_KEY"

# Scrape structured JSON (same as Firecrawl's core use case)
curl -G "https://api.snapapi.pics/v1/scrape" \
  --data-urlencode "url=https://example.com" \
  -H "X-Api-Key: YOUR_KEY"

# Screenshot — same key, not possible with Firecrawl
curl -G "https://api.snapapi.pics/v1/screenshot" \
  --data-urlencode "url=https://example.com" \
  -H "X-Api-Key: YOUR_KEY" \
  --output screenshot.png

# PDF generation — same key, not possible with Firecrawl
curl -G "https://api.snapapi.pics/v1/pdf" \
  --data-urlencode "url=https://example.com" \
  -H "X-Api-Key: YOUR_KEY" \
  --output page.pdf

Frequently asked questions

Can Firecrawl take screenshots?

No. Firecrawl is focused on scraping and content extraction. It does not capture screenshots, generate PDFs, produce OG images, or record video. SnapAPI provides all of these alongside the same extraction capabilities.

Does SnapAPI support LLM data pipelines like Firecrawl does?

Yes. SnapAPI's /v1/extract endpoint returns clean Markdown from any URL — stripped of navigation boilerplate, with tables and links preserved. It is designed for RAG pipelines, AI assistants, and LLM document ingestion, equivalent to Firecrawl's core extraction capability.

If I use Firecrawl today, can I switch to SnapAPI?

Yes. The extraction and scraping API patterns are similar. Replace the base URL, swap your key, and adjust the field names to match SnapAPI's schema. The free tier (no credit card) lets you validate your integration before committing.

Does SnapAPI have Firecrawl's bulk crawl / sitemap crawl feature?

SnapAPI processes pages individually via its queue infrastructure. For bulk crawling at scale, you queue multiple requests via the BullMQ-backed queue. Firecrawl has a more native "crawl a whole site" mode that SnapAPI does not replicate exactly in a single API call.

Which should I choose if I only need web scraping?

If you exclusively need bulk site crawling and have no interest in screenshots, PDFs, or visual capture, Firecrawl's native crawl mode may suit that narrow use case. If you need scraping plus any visual output — or plan to add them later — SnapAPI covers everything under one key and one bill.

Try SnapAPI free — no credit card needed

200 requests/month free, forever. Scrape, extract, screenshot, and generate PDFs — all from the same API key.

Get your free API key →
200 free requests/month No credit card 6 SDKs included All features, one price

More comparisons